I wrote the title and is sounding the alarm, my fault: I used "abortion" as the first word. The abortion issue is so controversial as to arouse syndrome inability to discern in many people. This article is not right about "abortion," his ethics and everything else, they speak of conscientious objection, ie del rifiuto di assolvere un obbligo di legge, di come sia regolamentato e di quale è la sua pratica. Fine del messaggio di avvertimento: si prega di attivare il cervello in modalità ragionamento .
Nel 1978, con l'introduzione della legge 194 che regolava l' interruzione volontaria di gravidanza , veniva regolamentata anche l'obiezione di coscienza (Art. 9).
Oggi, l'obiezione di coscienza, assume aspetti differenti da quelli di trent'anni prima; oltre alle ovvie ragioni morali di chi decide di dichiararsi obiettore ci sono altre ragioni.
1. Ragioni economiche : ovvero quelle dei medici che privatamente (e quindi ricevendo denaro direttamente for the health service) practice abortion even if the objectors say in public. These doctors not only lacked consistency, but they commit an offense
.* 2. Besides that economic exists then the appearance of what could be called 'objection return, that is, doctors who do not have a moral impediments in performing abortions, taking advantage of this opportunity to escape the amount of work caused by the high number of objectors that legally (for moral reasons or otherwise) are fleeing to the fulfillment of this particular work task and activities allied to abortion.
3. Thirty years later, there a mechanism more complex to analyze, common can be summarized as follows: Health is a feud. Who holds various positions in health care has a role of power, both for the economic value (investments and costs) which that position entails, both for the political value (armchairs and subdivisions). It so happens that power and politics (right, center and left) infiltrating an area for convenience in the company, but sometimes it also happens that use this area for their own ideological purposes. In this particular case, the area of \u200b\u200bCatholic-conservative power center, using the fee-health, such as the battlefield of ideals that dignity to be protected, but not in this subtle way it goes, in essence, to weigh on the shoulders, and suffering on the lives of people, whoever they are.
But thirty years ago you knew all this? You would expect, but in 1978, Article 9 was essential to defend the right of workers to continue practicing Catholics job for which they had spent, had studied, committed time, effort and experience. The introduction of a new law on a subject so strong, was to create a rift with the past, we introduced a new component (is legalized) in medical practice in Italy. Article 9 is not wrong, but had to have a deadline, they should be able to enjoy this right doctor who was already and gynecologist who had already left medicine in 1978, anyone would be attending in medicine from that date onwards, should have taken note of the new law and the mutation in the course of Italian society. One might wonder why a police officer or police officer is not exempted from the Catholic to shoot a criminal, to save a person who risks his life, or if a firefighter jew practitioner is exempted from extinguishing a fire on Saturday. The state is secular, and where the individual has a particular moral (although widespread), must give up this trade practice which imposes obligations that conflict with his beliefs. No one was forced to become a police officer, no one has been forced to become medico, tanto meno ginecologo. Dalla difesa di un diritto, si è arrivati alla difesa di una morale religiosa non da tutti condivisa, e che così viene di fatto imposta alla società. Avvenimento non raro in Italia.
*Art.9
comma 6: L'obiezione di coscienza si intende revocata, con effetto, immediato, se chi l'ha sollevata prende parte a procedure o a interventi per l'interruzione della gravidanza previsti dalla presente legge, al di fuori dei casi di cui al comma precedente. [comma 5: L'obiezione di coscienza non può essere invocata dal personale sanitario, ed esercente le attività ausiliarie quando, data la particolarità delle circostanze, il loro personale intervento è indispensabile per salvare la vita della donna in imminente pericolo.]
0 comments:
Post a Comment