Article 3 provides the opportunity for mayors to support associations of citizens to the police, whose task is to report situations where intervention is needed of them. The associations have to be included in a list maintained by the prefect and mayors will have to choose between them, as a priority, those consisting of retired members of the police, the armed forces, and other state bodies. The associations included in the lists should not be the target of economic resources in charge of public finance, it is unclear whether this also applies to those specific groups (ex-Forces order, the former armed forces, etc..) that have a priority over the others.
This is the essence of the law, now the reflections:
- The more people on the streets the better, it is hoped that voluntary groups bring more security and then ripopolino the streets of citizens to leave, thus avoiding degradation of the prey.
- It is hoped that none of these associations, none, or receive any kind of direct or indirect subsidies, it is useless to spend resources (including minimum) to support tasks bland when law enforcement has long been living with a large shortage of resources * (scarcity of resources declared by the same forces, not by some mysterious enemy of the government).
- Alcuni sindacati di polizia dichiarano che le ronde sono inutili e dannose perché impegneranno le forze dell'ordine in compiti di controllo e difesa dei cittadini volontari.
- Per concludere, bisogna segnalare che alcune associazioni di volontari desiderosi di pattugliare le strade si sono distinte di recente per la loro appartenenza a gruppi politici o ad ideologie pericolose , non si può nascondere il probabile problema della caccia-al-diverso (caccia al negro, al frocio, al fascista, al comunista, al tifoso avverso, al giovane, allo zingaro, al ricco, al barbone...sono solo alcune tra le tante). Impedire l'uso di simboli, richiami politici e divise non garantisce sulle intenzioni volunteers, even if you do not solve the problem in the bud (for example, by prohibiting organizations and constituting only a single list of citizen volunteers organized by the municipality itself, thus avoiding the danger that the associations have an ideological view of safety) is better that there are these symbols, these black shirts, and be clearly visible so that people can visibly see that there is a potential danger and that it is better to avoid these new masters of the road .. . and again all at home, but empty streets patrolled.
* Do not be surprised to see that much in funds allocated to these associations, given the tendency to spend money unnecessary operations on the security front. The operation "safer streets" that military usage 3000 (now 4000) in Italian cities, has a strong economic impact. The military as professionals have a fixed salary, and at the time of their use in an operational theater, and the operation "safe streets" shall be considered, must receive what is essentially a pay rise, which in this case specifically would be around € 500 more per month. A quick calculation shows that it is costly military presence on Italian roads, those resources could be used for law enforcement officers (who have full powers of intervention as opposed to the military but can only identify e perquisire ma non arrestare). I militari sono un supporto utile, spettacolare ma molto dispendioso.
0 comments:
Post a Comment