di FIORENZO BAINI
E’ già cominciata la fase del ricordo e della rievocazione. Un anno fa di questi tempi iniziava la cavalcata che si sarebbe conclusa in modo trionfale a Berlino e tutti ricorderanno come, man mano ci appressasse alla meta finale, si ricorresse alle scaramanzie, ai corsi e ricorsi storici, dalla finale disputata every twelve years the semi-finals played with the team of the reigning pope and other goodies like that.
's over well, but when they start the World Cup and that of Germany was no exception, are other constants that succeed in this restless, perhaps because the list may be useful when, in South Africa, we will look at the crystal ball or consult coffee grounds.
's over well, but when they start the World Cup and that of Germany was no exception, are other constants that succeed in this restless, perhaps because the list may be useful when, in South Africa, we will look at the crystal ball or consult coffee grounds.
The first constant is that, in principle, when Italy is good for the first game of the second wrong, and vice versa. In 1994 against the Republic of Ireland failed miserably to throw your heart over the obstacle against Norway passing with merit. In 1998, Baggio gave us cling to balance against Chile in the first game only to find a convincing victory against Cameroon. In 2002 the media had not yet ceased to celebrate the legendary victory over the mediocre Ecuador that Croatia has already had spread.
the bottom in 2006 the constant was repeated, and the victory against Ghana was faultless in both result in the game while following the game against the USA was a rare ugliness.
the bottom in 2006 the constant was repeated, and the victory against Ghana was faultless in both result in the game while following the game against the USA was a rare ugliness.
just that, if we think of courses and resorts, I was worried because, with my mind, I went to the magical night of 1990. The meeting with the onset of Austria was one of the best games that Italy has never played in a World Cup so we expect a lot from the second game with the United States were the Cinderella of the group, just like in Germany. If the theory is applicable
Vico courses and resorts in football history, it follows that the United States will always play bad. The question is, is because they are playing badly you are playing badly or because there is always worrying when Italy guesses the first game of his world?
In 1990, the U.S. national was perhaps worse than the current one, as usual, very competitive but not too foul, Italy made a beautiful goal with Giannini, then missed a penalty with Vialli and began to underestimate the opponents, however, were more proactive compared to those seen in Germany so that, ultimately, the best that Zenga was perhaps the first parried a terrible punishment, and then said to be riveted on the doorstep.
Last year, there is no doubt that, thanks to heavy play, De Rossi nonsense aside, the U.S. is not allowed to play but it was true that there was not a correct approach to the game. Thinking
then the bad game by 90 and the use of this historic world made me think of a well-played but ultimately lost.
If it is not over so maybe it is because both positive and negative, the courses and resorts in football history is not a scientific law but a mere opinion, but mainly because there something in the head of the Italian players as in the DNA that leads the entire nation to give your best when you are on the brink of the abyss. Here you can take philosophy. Italy and its national do not have the vacuous horror, nothing is done to avoid the precipice, perhaps rushed there as well but, like anyone else, you cling to the small ledge, go up and when it was re-emerges data for dead and buried.
Italy has never been as great as after the war, horror and desolation, and the Italian national team as well, in footballing terms similar. But not enough, as superstitious believe the media, we came closer to world events in situazione di scarsa credibilità. No, occorre che anche l’approccio sia sbagliato perché se no quello che è fondamentale in queste competizioni cioè partire col piede giusto è utile per tutti ma non per noi. A noi serve che la nostra squadra sia credibile e che gli avversari ci terrorizzino.
Vico courses and resorts in football history, it follows that the United States will always play bad. The question is, is because they are playing badly you are playing badly or because there is always worrying when Italy guesses the first game of his world?
In 1990, the U.S. national was perhaps worse than the current one, as usual, very competitive but not too foul, Italy made a beautiful goal with Giannini, then missed a penalty with Vialli and began to underestimate the opponents, however, were more proactive compared to those seen in Germany so that, ultimately, the best that Zenga was perhaps the first parried a terrible punishment, and then said to be riveted on the doorstep.
Last year, there is no doubt that, thanks to heavy play, De Rossi nonsense aside, the U.S. is not allowed to play but it was true that there was not a correct approach to the game. Thinking
then the bad game by 90 and the use of this historic world made me think of a well-played but ultimately lost.
If it is not over so maybe it is because both positive and negative, the courses and resorts in football history is not a scientific law but a mere opinion, but mainly because there something in the head of the Italian players as in the DNA that leads the entire nation to give your best when you are on the brink of the abyss. Here you can take philosophy. Italy and its national do not have the vacuous horror, nothing is done to avoid the precipice, perhaps rushed there as well but, like anyone else, you cling to the small ledge, go up and when it was re-emerges data for dead and buried.
Italy has never been as great as after the war, horror and desolation, and the Italian national team as well, in footballing terms similar. But not enough, as superstitious believe the media, we came closer to world events in situazione di scarsa credibilità. No, occorre che anche l’approccio sia sbagliato perché se no quello che è fondamentale in queste competizioni cioè partire col piede giusto è utile per tutti ma non per noi. A noi serve che la nostra squadra sia credibile e che gli avversari ci terrorizzino.
0 comments:
Post a Comment